|
my aim |
is mainly to note how posted opinions are viewed by mainstream scientists. It is more difficult to get support for the incremental, solid progress in earthquake hazard mitigation when the public constantly hears claims of amazing feats of earthquake prediction reported by some more credulous and opportunistic elements of the press. So I offer my perspective when posts such as this one make wild and baseless claims to the internet community. Follow Ups: ● Re: my aim - Roger Hunter 19:06:12 - 9/27/2012 (80380) (1) ● semi-legit - John Vidale 20:49:38 - 9/27/2012 (80381) (0) |
|