Typical that you can argue people should ignore posts from someone whose qualifications can be vetted with a simple google search, just because an anonymous poster says so.

And moreover, my points are very, very simple, yet you can't understand them, let alone rebut them.

Your "prediction" was high probability, lacking in magnitude estimate, and lacking in an end time. No statistics have been compiled, and the indicators you use have not been defined, not have you checked whether they even correlate with earthquake occurrence.

I wouldn't tell people to ignore your posts because they are the best evidence there is nothing to them.