Re: bullseye probability
Posted by michael on June 12, 2001 at 07:01:59:

Morning All!

I think the scheme would matter given the usual small number of EQs predicted by a predictor. I think the larger the number of predictions becomes, the less it matters, but since we are dealing with small quantities, it does come into play. But, your right. Given the same scoring system applied accross the board (no pun intended), and a substantial number of predictions, it shouldn't matter whether the rings step or are gradual (more precise). I guess I got a thing about precision......

Now where is that coffee ...... michael

michael


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: bullseye probability - Roger Musson  02:52:01 - 6/13/2001  (7963)  (1)
        ● Bond - michael  10:18:37 - 6/13/2001  (7968)  (0)