|
Re: bullseye probability |
Its a tought, tough subject these 'near misses' - the bullseye doesn't work better than any other type of method. When you say 2 degrees are you talking longitude/latitude degrees? 10% for being off 2 full degrees? Isn't that something like roughly 140 miles off and get 90%? I guess it depends on how/what you are predicting - get a 70% for being 420 miles off? - gee - nearly the distance from LA to SF... I would have to think anyone predicting a quake for the la area and one hits san francisco would be scoring a miss...They obviously should get some credit for seeing something but its time to refine those techniques... Canie Follow Ups: ● Re: bullseye probability - Roger Hunter 09:43:14 - 6/12/2001 (7948) (1) ● Re: bullseye probability - Roger Musson 02:55:19 - 6/13/2001 (7964) (1) ● Re: bullseye probability - Roger Hunter 04:41:00 - 6/13/2001 (7966) (0) |
|