Regarding Those Charts -Important - September 19, 2011
Posted by EQF on September 19, 2011 at 20:13:31:

Information Regarding Those Charts – Posted by EQF on September 19, 2011

Update – The fatalities count for that India earthquake is now reportedly up around 65.

Hi Chris and all,

As I have said before, I can be away from my Internet connection for a day or two at a time. And it might take me a while to see and then answer questions.

Your note regarding my chart etc. might have been extremely valuable.

It provided me with some information that is important to efforts that I am making to try to get the U.S. and our global economy out of the permanent state of recession and also get science moving faster and more effectively and efficiently.

PROBLEMS

Your note and others indicate to me that there are two major problems (among others) that are helping hold back science.

1. Scientists are simply often unaware of the existence of certain types of information that are important to some subject such as earthquake forecasting.

This second problem applies to everyone, not just scientists.

2. Scientists often form opinions regarding some subject that essentially represent what they want to believe, regardless of whether or not those opinions are correct. And when arguments are made against those opinions the scientists often simply come up with some convenient excuse for not listening to the arguments.

MY FORECASTING CHARTS

The specific question that you had regarding my chart is one that I had to go through using E-mail with another board poster. And your note demonstrates that those two problems listed above are far more widespread than I thought.

In the next few days I need to finish another earthquake related project that has a deadline. So I can’t go into too much detail in this report. But, the basic problem here regarding my charts appears to be that even after all of the notes I have posted here and on my Web sites and in spite of the information in my report about that India earthquake you and the other board poster don’t understand what my charts are saying.

They basically say two things.

1. The standard forecasting charts on my Data.html Web page advise people to watch fault zones at certain longitudes for possible significant approaching seismic activity.

2. The special research charts such as the one below concerning that India earthquake have other purposes as I will explain. And you and the other board poster missed that.

This topic is so important, in my opinion, that it can virtually mean the difference between life and death.

The similar line peak structures in the large circled area on that chart are a good indicator that the EM Signals were generated by that approaching earthquake.

The reasons for that have been explained many times in my board notes and at my Web sites. I won’t go into them again in detail in this note to save time.

The reason there is no line peak at 88 E has to do with the way my forecasting computer programs work. They basically said that with that chart, the earthquake itself and the EM Signals looked more like California area earthquakes (~120 W) than past earthquakes that occurred at 88 E.

However, the fact that the line structures looked so similar is an indicator that the EM Signals and earthquake were related even though they did not have a strong line peak at 88 E.

As indicated on the chart, one of the EM Signals was virtually identical to one of the India earthquake aftershocks. That happens quite often with those charts.

GOAL – There are probably several dozen variables associated with my earthquake forecasting computer program that need to be optimized so that the program will do a better job of identifying the correct longitude for an approaching earthquake.

However, those optimizations take time. And although I am working on that I am also doing a fair amount of work on trying to get general earthquake forecasting efforts organized at the U.S. and international levels. And it appears that it is important to include more explanation information with those charts when they are displayed here.

These are personal opinions.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Regarding Those Charts -Important - September 19, 2011 - EQF  21:11:40 - 9/19/2011  (79265)  (1)
        ● Re: Regarding Those Charts -Important - September 19, 2011 - Roger Hunter  21:18:49 - 9/19/2011  (79267)  (1)
           ● Re: Regarding Those Charts -Important - September 19, 2011 - EQF  03:57:44 - 9/20/2011  (79268)  (1)
              ● Re: Regarding Those Charts -Important - September 19, 2011 - Roger Hunter  09:26:50 - 9/20/2011  (79269)  (0)