Hi Chris,

If is my belief that you really don’t understand how my forecasting program works. And you should not listen to Roger if he insists that he does.

In fact I believe that you yourself stated in the past that you have never visited any of my Web sites where the technology is explained.

And so, if you are not making an effort to actually learn how the program works then in my opinion you should not be commenting the accuracy of the forecast data.

You have probably noticed that I won’t even respond to notes posted by the other individual that you mentioned as I feel that it is important to maintain a pleasant atmosphere on this bulletin board rather than get into heated arguments as has so often happened in the past. Canie is volunteering her time to keeping the board running. And we should try to make things easy and pleasant for her.

Regarding that volcano, once again your analyses is inaccurate because you don’t know how my forecasting program works. So, here is a short description of the present theories associated with it.

The Earth’s geomagnetic energy field gets periodically charged by certain types of events such a solar storms and activity related to volcanic eruptions, exceptionally powerful earthquakes, and even hurricanes and tornados.

That geomagnetic energy can then interact with stressed areas in the Earth’s crust such as areas where there are active volcanoes or earthquake fault zones where an earthquake is getting ready to occur.

New and different types of EM Signals including the ones that I myself work with and the Ear Tones that I understand you yourself detect then result from those interaction processes. And although it is easy to distinguish between signals that got started with hurricanes and tornados, and the others, it can be difficult to tell the difference between the EM Signals that are generated when the geomagnetic energy field interacts with an earthquake fault zone or a volcano area.

These latest warning signals look a little suspicious because one of the possible locations is 155 W where Kilauea is located.

On the other hand, if those latest signals are actually earthquake related then it is expected that the approaching earthquake could be very powerful. And if it occurred near a heavily populated area it could do a lot of damage.

With that much at stake it doesn’t pay to take chances and assume that the expected activity will be relatively harmless volcanic activity and not earthquake activity.

Finally, the new Web site I mentioned should be operational some time this week, possibly even later today. And these types of somewhat unpleasant arguments that are largely a waste of time should gradually start to disappear. They won’t be allowed in any discussions at the new site if there are bulletin boards are running there.

These are personal opinions.