|
|
|
|
| Re: 150 M6+ quakes/year: how many are aftershocks? |
some part of the 150 M6+ quakes/year would be aftershocks so would have to be removed before getting probabilities for quakes >1000 km (or >5000 km) from each other. Follow Ups: ● Re: 150 M6+ quakes/year: how many are aftershocks? - Roger Hunter 10:23:04 - 9/4/2011 (79187) (1) ● Re: 150 M6+ quakes/year: how many are aftershocks? - Roger Hunter 11:58:22 - 9/4/2011 (79188) (1) ● Re: 150 M6+ quakes/year: how many are aftershocks? - heartland chris 19:23:11 - 9/4/2011 (79190) (1) ● Re: 150 M6+ quakes/year: how many are aftershocks? - Roger Hunter 21:34:33 - 9/4/2011 (79191) (1) ● yes, M6+, not M7+ - heartland chris 12:35:12 - 9/5/2011 (79193) (2) ● Re: yes, M6+, not M7+ - Roger Hunter 15:37:22 - 9/5/2011 (79200) (1) ● Re: yes, M6+, not M7+ - heartland chris 06:15:47 - 9/12/2011 (79221) (1) ● Re: yes, M6+, not M7+ - Roger Hunter 15:27:33 - 9/12/2011 (79227) (0) ● good example - John Vidale 13:30:36 - 9/5/2011 (79195) (1) ● Re: good example - heartland chris 15:07:12 - 9/5/2011 (79198) (1) ● also - John Vidale 16:26:34 - 9/5/2011 (79201) (0) |
|
|
|
|
