|
Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 |
As I have said in the past, board visitors would, in my opinion, be wise to ignore the types of response posts listed here by these other posters. The forecast data and theories at my Web sites are presented in such a manner that they should be understandable by anyone who did reasonably well with high school physics, and who is actually interested in learning if earthquakes can be predicted and how they can be predicted. Those people’s comments usually indicate to me that one of those conditions appears to be missing for them. Follow Ups: ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Skywise 01:36:44 - 5/9/2011 (78765) (1) ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - EQF 02:15:59 - 5/9/2011 (78767) (2) ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Skywise 11:56:14 - 5/9/2011 (78769) (1) ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - EQF 07:31:03 - 5/10/2011 (78777) (1) ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Skywise 12:34:48 - 5/10/2011 (78784) (0) ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Roger Hunter 08:17:22 - 5/9/2011 (78768) (1) ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - EQF 07:22:29 - 5/10/2011 (78776) (2) ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Skywise 12:20:56 - 5/10/2011 (78782) (0) ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Roger Hunter 08:51:14 - 5/10/2011 (78781) (0) |
|