Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011
Posted by EQF on May 09, 2011 at 01:02:49:

As I have said in the past, board visitors would, in my opinion, be wise to ignore the types of response posts listed here by these other posters.

The forecast data and theories at my Web sites are presented in such a manner that they should be understandable by anyone who did reasonably well with high school physics, and who is actually interested in learning if earthquakes can be predicted and how they can be predicted.

Those people’s comments usually indicate to me that one of those conditions appears to be missing for them.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Skywise  01:36:44 - 5/9/2011  (78765)  (1)
        ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - EQF  02:15:59 - 5/9/2011  (78767)  (2)
           ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Skywise  11:56:14 - 5/9/2011  (78769)  (1)
              ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - EQF  07:31:03 - 5/10/2011  (78777)  (1)
                 ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Skywise  12:34:48 - 5/10/2011  (78784)  (0)
           ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Roger Hunter  08:17:22 - 5/9/2011  (78768)  (1)
              ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - EQF  07:22:29 - 5/10/2011  (78776)  (2)
                 ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Skywise  12:20:56 - 5/10/2011  (78782)  (0)
                 ● Re: YEAR CHART DATA - May 7, 2011 - Roger Hunter  08:51:14 - 5/10/2011  (78781)  (0)