|
test for meaningfulness? |
Have you ever thought of trying to see statistically whether your patterns mean anything? Testing the timing and location of peaks again real and randomized catalogs? I know this has been suggested over and over to you, but it is indisputably the minimum hurdle your predictions need to pass before any serious scientist would take a second look at your hypotheses. Follow Ups: ● Re: test for meaningfulness? - Roger Hunter 14:16:54 - 5/7/2011 (78744) (1) ● That's why he doesn't talk to them - Roger Hunter 14:48:00 - 5/7/2011 (78746) (1) ● Re: That's why he doesn't talk to them - PennyB 17:02:46 - 5/7/2011 (78747) (1) ● Re: That's why he doesn't talk to them - Roger Hunter 17:25:38 - 5/7/2011 (78748) (0) |
|