|
Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011 |
EQF; You must have been looking in a mirror when you posted this because it fits you perfectly. You've spent what? 20 years trying to get your theory studied by governments all over the world with no success that I'm aware of. And you say I'M locked into a fixed mode? LOL! You say your data are extraordinary and extremely valuable yet you have never tested them to see if they work, have no idea what the signals are or where they originate and yet insist they are quake related. That's not the proper behavior for a professional anything, let alone a research scientist. You want me to change my mind? Show me your proof because your graphs wouldn't convince a high school statistics class. Or take a poll and see who the board agrees with. We have real scientists with verifiable credentials posting here. I am not posting with animosity. I just get bored when I don't have programs to work on. And I'm still waiting for that Perl code. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011 - EQF 19:31:51 - 4/26/2011 (78691) (0) |
|