apparently you didn't read the article
Posted by John Vidale on March 31, 2011 at 09:29:45:

Yes, it collects reports of earthquake precursors.

Then it bans predictions issued either by individuals or institutions.
Then it calls more plans to retrofit buildings.
Then it lists bogus precursors that were not real.
Then it quotes people saying it is better to check spurious reports of precursors to hear more reliably that they are just unfounded rumors, before the rumors gain unfounded credibility.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: apparently you didn't read the article - heartland chris  09:54:17 - 3/31/2011  (78512)  (1)
        ● Not the case (plus) a new Strong EM Signal - EQF  23:16:41 - 4/1/2011  (78518)  (2)
           ● alternate reality - John Vidale  10:05:24 - 4/2/2011  (78526)  (1)
              ● Re: alternate reality - Skywise  11:40:04 - 4/2/2011  (78529)  (1)
                 ● Re: alternate reality - PennyB  14:54:00 - 4/2/2011  (78530)  (0)
           ● Re: Not the case (plus) a new Strong EM Signal - heartland chris  06:50:10 - 4/2/2011  (78523)  (0)