Brian, when EQF made that post, I thought about making a post on top of it, but decided to give it a day, and you and John posted on top, which was appropriate. I did not bpost ecause it was not worth it for me. Why don't people who are annoyed by EQF just not read his posts? I keep an eye on some of them, but don't read them all. If some statements do go unchallenged, or if there was not a way to challenge them, I also would have to leave this board.

But, I may be wrong, but it does seem to me that you have been posting a contradiction: you don't want to be censored yourself, but you don't want EQF to post. I don't know if you can have it both ways. EQF does not post things that rise to the level of reason for him/her to be tossed from the board.

There can be damage done if pseudo-science goes unchallenged. I'm talking about damage to people's lives.
Chris