"...because science researchers are often extremely sensitive to criticism."

That's a cop out in my opinion. Science is DRIVEN by criticism. A theory stands because it withstood criticism. An idea gains ground because no one can tear it down.

"People will need to have my permission to post..."

Guess I'm not invited, eh?

I'll admit I may get a little strong in my criticism of you, EQF, but to a degree it's deserved. Why? Because you absolutely refuse to answer the simplest of questions. You refuse to accept criticism of your ideas. You refuse to provide any backing material for your ideas. You brag about all the scientists you work with without ever naming one. You puff yourself up with innuendo's about all these great things you are doing or are going to do, yet we see nothing. And further, you take the arrogant attitude and insist that no one can post replies to the threads you start.

Now don't get me entirely wrong here. I am still open to the possibility that your work may have merit. If it does, your tenacity and work ethic will let you succeed.

My complaint is how you present yourself. I find your posts to be glam, glitter, bling, but no substance. It's obvious others do as well.

Please try to take my comments as constructive criticism (I know it may be hard), but you have an image problem.

Brian