theory is not real: Copernicus
Posted by heartland chris on December 21, 2010 at 11:43:12:

Amit, I looked at your site very briefly and saw your text about your theory being physics and not astrology. This is not correct. It is astrology and not science. The change in motions and speeds or planets is not real. They don't change their motions and speeds that way. It is only the apparent motion as viewed from earth that changes. In other words, this is an illusion. This has been well understood for a few hundred years: I think it was Copernicus. See the link and click on "heliocentric model."

There you will see "Retrograde motion of the planets is explained by Earth's motion"

There are plenty of Americans who do not know this, but you do tend to learn it in school (meaning, Kindergarten to 12th grade). Many Americans think the earth is flat, the earth is the center of the solar system, etc. But, it is not just scientists who cannot take you seriously with that on your web site: it is well-informed people in general. You can easily learn about orbital motions online.

Chris



Follow Ups:
     ● Re: theory is not real: Copernicus - Roger Hunter  16:27:39 - 12/21/2010  (77876)  (1)
        ● Re: theory is not real: Copernicus - Amit Dave  00:13:30 - 12/22/2010  (77878)  (1)
           ● Re: theory is not real: Copernicus - PennyB  22:09:42 - 12/22/2010  (77881)  (0)