Hi Cathryn,

"Thanks for the nice comments."

My pleasure.

"This is the 5.7 at 116 W on the 15th I was referring to:

2010/06/15 04:26:58 32.69N 115.92W 7 5.7 Southern California"

My map shows it on the 14th, hence the discrepancy.

"I am going to try to add some additional comments to the original post in this thread within a few days. There is another important project that needs attention at the moment."

Boy do I understand that one.

"There was an absolutely extraordinary recent success with forecasting a Papua New Guinea earthquake that just occurred. It involved using a data processing procedure that does not always clearly appear on my charts but is discussed in detail at my Web site."

As long as it is somewhere on the web, it should be counted as a prediction.

"However, that forecast information was sent in plenty of time to earthquake researchers around the world. More on that later."

Okay. I'll look forward to it.

Cathryn