Okay. I found them.

I took a quick look at your forecasts for 2009 and compared them with a table of 7 and higher magnitude earthquakes that occurred in 2009. And I have to agree with what I believe Roger has been saying. It does not look like there is much of a correlation. And if you can't get good matches with even the 7 and higher magnitude earthquakes then you need to wonder if the forecasting method is working.

Also, based on my understanding of how your forecasting method works I myself would not really expect it to generate too many accurate forecasts.

However, as I have also said in the past, experienced scientists are in my opinion usually hesitant to say that something is impossible or that it doesn't work. So I will simply state here that your forecasting method doesn't appear to me to be working. And I suspect that you might be wasting your time with it.