Posted by EQF on May 01, 2010 at 21:38:04:
Until my new Web site is running it is difficult to make any picture files etc. available to show what the outcome is regarding these advisories and warnings. My present Web sites don’t have the needed download capacity. Or they are simply not reliable. People who checked the Chart on the day that the above advisory was posted would have seen a strong longitude line peak at 177 W. And the following powerful earthquakes occurred shortly after that. As files stored at my new Web site will show (when it gets running), those earthquakes were excellent matches for the Chart data. Fortunately the earthquakes occurred out in the ocean and just frightened some fish. Inland they could have done a lot of damage. 2010/04/30 23:16:30 60.52N 177.72W 16 6.0 2010/04/30 23:11:45 60.64N 177.90W 15 6.3 2010/04/30 23:10:24 60.62N 177.90W 14 4.3 Bering Sea NEIS Data Other earthquake forecasters around the world should be monitoring those longitude line peaks for areas of interest to them. And they should be comparing my data with their own forecast data for their local expected earthquakes. I don’t have time to watch for everyone’s earthquakes. Those Charts have a format that makes it easy for people to see if a longitude line peak is appearing where they live. And that would normally take them just a few seconds or a few minutes to determine.
|