|
Re: Bay Area Seismicity lowest in 40 or maybe more years |
It would be interesting to see if the graph if it is easy to link it for you. If aftershocks are not removed, I'd expect 1989 and 1990 to have as many M3s aas the rest of the years put together (Loma Prieta aftershocks). But, that would not explain the pattern you see from how you describe it. Follow Ups: ● Re: Bay Area Seismicity lowest in 40 or maybe more years - Todd 21:45:32 - 1/9/2010 (76357) (1) ● Re: Bay Area Seismicity lowest in 40 or maybe more years - Canie 23:40:26 - 1/10/2010 (76362) (0) |
|