Re: Earthquake Prediction Registry
Posted by Lowell on May 19, 2001 at 20:52:32:

I can agree with your general comments.
The Jones algorithm appears to do the job of declustering the catalog which is
needed to evaluate single predictions. I am a bit uncomfortable using it to
evaluate public predictions, however, because it has not been published in
a journal where predictors can review how the process works. There must
be other published techniques which work equally well, and would allow
us to cite a reference for the evaluation technique.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Earthquake Prediction Registry - michael  09:41:55 - 5/20/2001  (7615)  (1)
        ● Re: Earthquake Prediction Registry - Lowell  11:54:29 - 5/20/2001  (7617)  (1)
           ● Re: Earthquake Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter  16:31:12 - 5/20/2001  (7619)  (1)
              ● Re: Earthquake Prediction Registry - Lowell  17:04:05 - 5/20/2001  (7620)  (0)
     ● Re: Earthquake Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter  05:36:30 - 5/20/2001  (7613)  (0)