|
Re: (1386) Earthquake Forecasts from January To April 2009 |
Thanks for your work, Roger. 2 S.D.s is quite a large variation isn't it? In other words, this result suggests a very high degree of insignificance, doesn't it? Mike Williams Follow Ups: ● Re: (1386) Earthquake Forecasts from January To April 2009 - Roger Hunter 20:14:45 - 5/14/2009 (75241) (1) ● Re: (1386) Earthquake Forecasts from January To April 2009 - Cathryn 03:44:04 - 5/17/2009 (75261) (1) ● Re: (1386) Earthquake Forecasts from January To April 2009 - Roger Hunter 08:47:51 - 5/17/2009 (75266) (0) |
|