Re: Good prediction for Montana this morning (Ml=3.8)
Posted by Lowell on May 11, 2001 at 17:13:29:

I guess, after reading it over again, my response did not really answer the
two questions you raised: 1) technique - as I understand it, it is scientifically
based and 2) reproducibility. I have been able to reproduce some of the
predictions using a home-grown program here, so if all aspects of the technique
were known (I am deliberately kept in the dark on some of it), I believe the
predictions would be completely reproducible.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Good prediction for Montana this morning (Ml=3.8) - Canie  10:33:31 - 5/14/2001  (7524)  (1)
        ● Re: Good prediction for Montana this morning (Ml=3.8) - Lowell  16:46:14 - 5/14/2001  (7526)  (0)