4 years seems short
Posted by John Vidale on March 10, 2008 at 19:56:03:

while the 22-year periodicity is widely criticized as not nearly so regular as was first thought, it would be surprising were Parkfield to re-break in just 4 years. To be honest, it is not clear there is a characteristic earthquake patch at Parkfield.

I'm still puzzling over a recent Custodio and Archuleta paper that claims the 1966 earthquake broke a different section of the San Andreas than the 2004 event - check the link.



Follow Ups:
     ● heard Custodio talk twice - heartland chris  07:08:46 - 3/11/2008  (73474)  (1)
        ● I've been puzzling about this for a month - John Vidale  07:49:40 - 3/11/2008  (73475)  (1)
           ● ask Custodio - heartland chris  14:03:07 - 3/12/2008  (73483)  (1)
              ● authors stand behind their work - John Vidale  06:57:44 - 3/13/2008  (73490)  (0)