|
|
|
hmm, backing off of previous post
|
Posted by heartland chris on October 18, 2007 at 06:04:41:
Hmm...I must have been a little cranky when I made the post right above. There are some interesting points in the paper but I still have some issues with it and have to deal with it. The point that it may be more common for questionable papers to go unchallenged rather than challenged is probably valid, though. Chris
|
|
|