See the link...it has a list of scientists (mostly) who disagree with one aspect or another of the consensus view of global warming/climate change. Boy, we could dive into this pretty deep: feel free to post these people one at a time and I'll look into what they say to the point that I have time. Or perhaps it is a waste of (my) time.

Got to go back to working on turning a student thesis into a publishable paper. It is on the Palos Verdes anticlinorium and the faults that cause it. We have a strong case on the geometry of the folds, a so-so case on the geometry of the faults that cause the folds (which faults cause the folding), and a variable case for whether the folds (and thus faults) are still active and thus a hazard to Los Angeles region. In some areas we know the folding is active, in others we know it is young (did not start until after 2 million years ago), and in the northwest, in Santa Monica Bay, our direct evidence for activity is weak, and so we argue a hypothesis that the basins are sinking: some basins are sinking, some parts are less clear. If the basins are sinking due to post-rift thermal cooling, and there is some rigidity to the crust, then the Continental shelves in Santa Monica Bay and San Pedro Shelf off of Long Beach, which are not sinking, must be held up....by thrust slip and related folding.
Chris

• list of deniers