|
|
|
Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire
|
Posted by Lowell on May 02, 2001 at 12:02:54:
Yes, subduction is the rule rather than the exception. The western U.S. is the exception rather than the rule, however. most of the volcanics (and plutonics) south of Shasta are an indirect result of subduction or melting. The Pacific plate currently slips along the coast of California on the San Andreas Fault, but this was not always the case. Much of the Pacific has actually subducted below the continent of North America. The east-Pacific rise is the spreading center for the Pacific and is currently located below the Rocky mountains (in fact in cross-section, the Colorado Rockies look exactly like a mid-ocean ridge system). As the Pacific was subducting at a shallow angle, it cause melting of large amounts of material beneath eastern California and the Basin and Range Province in Nevada. It is this melted material which makes up the volcanic provinces in this region, but the subduction itself. It is currently very difficult to identify a subduction zone under this region, but it is thought that it must be there because of the strong melting. The temperatures under this region are much higher than under most continental regions of the world.
Follow Ups:
● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - michael 12:22:34 - 5/2/2001 (7279) (1)
● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - Lowell 12:36:50 - 5/2/2001 (7283) (1)
● Complications - michael 12:54:23 - 5/2/2001 (7284) (0)
● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - Canie 12:07:28 - 5/2/2001 (7278) (2)
● Movies - michael 13:49:27 - 5/2/2001 (7286) (0)
● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - michael 12:25:32 - 5/2/2001 (7281) (0)
|
|
|