|
Re: two quakes |
Thanks for the elaboration, John. In layperson's terms, could the suggestion of two quakes be simply the breaking of two asperities: an initial break leading to the rapidly subsequent failure of a second asperity due to stress transfer? Mike W. Follow Ups: ● really just one quake - John Vidale 12:24:02 - 8/16/2007 (72431) (1) ● Re: really just one quake - Skywise 22:08:56 - 8/16/2007 (72433) (1) ● ok, there's complexity - John Vidale 23:03:17 - 8/16/2007 (72435) (0) |
|