|
Re: EQ question |
Hi Todd! Long time. But weren't the two foreshocks to LP separated by a little over a year? What happened within 7 days of the first foreshock? Certainly nothing in the 6's. I am glad you got my questions and have also noticed an astounding lack of aftershocks (and paltry ones at that) after this 4.2 in Oakland. Not that a 4.2 is all that significant, but on the N. segment of the Hayward Fault after nothing that strong going on there since ???, I think it stands out as somewhat ominous. Not trying to monger fear, here. I was just astonished that it took over 24 hours for the first little aftershock to come in. Cathryn Follow Ups: ● Re: EQ question - Todd 02:09:05 - 7/22/2007 (72265) (1) ● Re: EQ question - Cathryn 11:33:10 - 7/23/2007 (72283) (0) ● Now it gets more interesting - Cathryn 18:24:30 - 7/21/2007 (72256) (1) ● Re: Now it gets more interesting - Roger Hunter 18:30:59 - 7/21/2007 (72257) (1) ● Re: Now it gets more interesting - Cathryn 18:51:59 - 7/21/2007 (72259) (0) |
|