I'm glad that Condon's site has the data you need. I didn't look at it closely, but I imagine the graphical presentations are accurate representations of instrumentally acquired data, and I can have no argument with that. In fact, since his site has virtually no explanatory text (other than cursory explanations of the graphs themselves), I have no beef with it. Other than that it _should_ explain what he's trying to show . . .

Thanks for clarifying, Glen.

MW
93420