|
Near Hits |
I'm just suggesting listing the predictions without any evaluation of any kind. Simply: 1. Predictor It would be up to each individual to evaluate any given "Hit", "Near Hit", or whatever. My point is that many so called "predictors" are even afraid to list their predictions out of fear of failure. All I'm suggesting is just listing the facts plain and simple, without any kind of public evaluation such as whether a prediction was a hit, miss, or whatever. Michael Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: Near Hits - Roger Hunter 04:51:32 - 4/11/2001 (6673) (0) |
|