Hello Jane, I always find it a little more interesting if I know the basis for a prediction....care to share? I was thinking that there were not quite enough people predicting on this page....although I've been one of those who have criticized where basis of prediction is not known, or does not make sense, or is too vague to mean anything, or where success is claimed where that does not seem so clear. I'm not critizing yours, except I would not worry too much about depth in detail...you could say above 35 km, but often quakes that size near subduction zones are just placed at 30 km for the location program: it does not mean that the first breakage actually was at 30 km.
Chris