Re: Earthquakes and lightning
Posted by Roger Musson on March 22, 2001 at 10:06:04:

I'll try and answer three posts together.

I wasn't being sarcastic. If you are suggesting (as I understood you to be) that earthquakes and lightning are correlated, then the global distribution of places prone to earthquakes and places prone to lightning should be similar. They aren't. Cameroons is one example at random. Colleagues of mine did some seismic monitoring of Lake Nyos many years ago and recorded nothing.

Earthquakes are not THAT poorly understood. There is an immense amount of data that has been worked on, and you should really try to familiarise yourself with more of it before imagining that work verified by many hundreds of eminent scientists should be chucked on account of an unsupported hunch that there might be some better hypothesis.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Earthquakes and lightning - David  14:27:30 - 3/22/2001  (6283)  (1)
        ● Re: Earthquakes and lightning - Dennis  15:38:02 - 3/22/2001  (6294)  (1)
           ● Re: Earthquakes and lightning - David  17:27:24 - 3/22/2001  (6301)  (1)
              ● Re: Earthquakes and lightning - Dennis  10:24:59 - 3/23/2001  (6333)  (1)
                 ● Re: Earthquakes and lightning - David  21:06:00 - 3/23/2001  (6361)  (1)
                    ● Extremely technical - David  21:59:56 - 3/23/2001  (6362)  (1)
                       ● Re: Extremely technical - Roger Musson  07:31:11 - 3/26/2001  (6385)  (0)