Hi Roger. Thanks for responding.

Your reply is rather interesting. It begins with "If we knew exactly what causes quakes." Yes I agree, you have a pretty good idea what does, but there seem to be so many parts of the equation that are just filled in to justify the theory. Just like the whole earthquake light theory. I just find it so difficult to believe that anyone would have been lucky enough to have the right kind of sensors in the right place to determine what this is. Seems like a guess that happens to fit in with the rest of the theory.

Can you explain the earthquake in Quebec yesterday? There seem to have been several over the last year in that area. Is this a tectonically active area? If so, are the current tectonic plates drawn correctly?