|
|
|
Re: fine tuning feelings...
|
Posted by George Gallen on March 04, 2001 at 17:56:55:
This is where something more than just searches from history, which is helpful, but... If you say save the closest 5 (and make programmable) for each search,( say by time frame) that might help nail one down, but also you need to compare each of the five closest to each other as well, just in some of the hits were off by 1 EQ level that could knock out 3 misses that could have been hits, since you were looking for the wrong collerations. Kind of throwing in a little std deviation on each level, so that all hit would count, and not all misses would could either. I database of quakes to compare to is great once it's narrowed, but from there, you need to be able to build a new database of quakes that you seem sensitive to, then by comparing each of these you could start to see some other patterns, or start to see some multiple patterns which sometimes can throw off what would seem like a hit to a miss and you just can't figure out why it wasn't what you thought. Excuse the rambling, just thinking out load. George
|
|
|