|
Re: Roger & Canie |
Best fit is rather hard to calculate but I meant the quake which is closest in time, space and size to the predicted event, up to some reasonable limit in all parameters. I just thought your limits were too large. It probably should be a separate table but keeping them together would let you avoid double scoring...a miss in one and a "close" in the other.
Follow Ups: ● Best Fit - michael 22:59:05 - 2/25/2001 (5462) (1) ● Re: Best Fit - Roger Hunter 05:00:24 - 2/26/2001 (5469) (0) |
|