Re: You Mean Close Hits?
Posted by Canie on February 20, 2001 at 13:38:42:

Yeah - there's got to be some subjectiveness I suppose - like martin's forecast for Ridgecrest and one hit 75miles away in Idyllwild - i don't consider that a close call at all. One is geothermal and the other is strike-slip faulting.

On the other hand I would think that Dennis's call for a 5 in Tejon and getting one further south at Big Bear near the same fault system is worth of some credit.

And martin's 20km outside of his area - 45km from location is pretty close though I am not familiar with the area.

Hard to distinguish - its a difficult thing to do. I guess we need to look at WHY we are attempting to predict - If we ever want any credible attention we have to have some justifiable methods - If we predicted a 6.5 for Northridge and a 6.5 hit in Dana Point - Opps - its close but the wrong people were evacuated. Now all the emergency vehicles and personnel are a few hours away from where they need to be.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: You Mean Close Hits? - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  20:43:28 - 2/20/2001  (5311)  (0)
     ● Agree - michael  13:44:39 - 2/20/2001  (5299)  (1)
        ● Re: Agree, Why not a seperate table? - Mary Maya  14:23:06 - 2/20/2001  (5300)  (1)
           ● Separate Table? - michael  14:48:52 - 2/20/2001  (5302)  (1)
              ● Re: Separate Table? - Roger Hunter  16:19:29 - 2/20/2001  (5303)  (1)
                 ● Scoring - michael  16:59:48 - 2/20/2001  (5306)  (1)
                    ● Re: Scoring - Roger Hunter  19:35:11 - 2/20/2001  (5309)  (0)