|
|
|
|
| Re: 4.3 a foreshock?no according to- |
Beg to differ - it was a 4.3 followed by a 4.1 - they are not aftershocks to any prior quakes. The 4.1 could be an aftershock to the 4.3. Apparently in an interview Dr. Lucy Jones (local geophysicist) said: "use this as a message to stock up and get prepared" - I didn't personally see the interview, but that's what another person has said. That's real good advice to me! Canie Follow Ups: ● Be Prepared - Michael 09:51:33 - 1/15/2001 (4581) (1) ● Re: Be Prepared -wise words! - martin 19:09:51 - 1/15/2001 (4589) (0) ● Re: 4.3 a foreshock?no according to- - Todd 18:06:39 - 1/14/2001 (4575) (1) ● Re: 4.3 a foreshock?no according to- - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 20:28:38 - 1/14/2001 (4576) (1) ● Re: 4.3 a foreshock?no according to- - Todd 23:07:56 - 1/14/2001 (4578) (1) ● Re: 4.3 a foreshock?no according to- - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 10:54:51 - 1/15/2001 (4582) (0) |
|
|
|
|
