Re: Alaska post#4421
Posted by martin@n.i.c.e. on January 10, 2001 at 11:30:17:

In re reading your post you state certainly not a hit. I always post HIT! when I have a hit. I didn't post HIT! because I already knew the forecast data was weak, but was only intending to inform that I knew it was coming. Thx, I'll let you know when I have a solid hit that can be confirmed with data, as this was lacking. For me, it hit where I thought it would.:)


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Alaska Activity to continue (Adak.) - martin@n.i.c.e.  13:11:26 - 1/10/2001  (4457)  (0)
     ● Hit - Michael  12:16:25 - 1/10/2001  (4455)  (0)