Re:don't bother with evaluating me
Posted by martin on January 02, 2001 at 18:21:07:

Not even close to worth the hassle when I ask you TO SPECIFY WHERE YOU GET YOUR FACTS(CLAIMED) (as in MY non existant P.N.G. forecast) and you don't reply to the question. I'll find a different evaluator. Your program probably hasn't been used yet as no one can satisfy your criteria. Makes your hobby easy huh?...mb. Don't badmouth my methods and I won't badmouth yours. Let's just stay on our own sides of the sandbox o.k.? P.S. I just saw on Syzygy SOMEONE ELSE said we'd need a direct line to GOD to satisfy your prediction criteria. Evaluate that...mb.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re:don't bother with evaluating me - Roger Hunter  19:59:31 - 1/2/2001  (4303)  (0)
     ● Re:correction - martin  18:28:09 - 1/2/2001  (4296)  (0)