|
Re: The information in the prior post is 100% accurate |
Perhaps I'm being prejudiced and allowing myself to to be influenced by stereotypes.... But as the saying goes, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck.... The first post reads like spam. This one reads like the ramblings of a net kook. If the information you seek to disseminate is truly appropriate for this forum, then you need to present it in a more appropriate form. For one thing, this last post looks like one giant run on sentence. Paragraph breaks would make reading it much easier. For that alone I didn't even bother to read it. I looked at the screen and saw a jumble of letters so messy I could have gone cross eyed and not known any better. Also, the capitolized insults towards those of us who found fault with your first post are a classic hallmark of the net kook. So, if you are not a spamming net kook, then you need to stop posting like one. To use an analogy, if you don't want to be mistaken for a gang banger, don't dress and act like one. Brian Follow Ups: ● Re: The information in the prior post is 100% accurate - Cathryn 23:21:52 - 10/3/2006 (41197) (1) ● Re: The information in the prior post is 100% accurate - Skywise 22:21:34 - 10/4/2006 (41238) (0) |
|