Re: Foreshocks and %
Posted by martin on December 07, 2000 at 16:16:06:

Hi Roger, and thanks for the reference to the article which I have seen before.
I beg to differ on the 7.5% figure, which I have proven wholly incorrect on some STUDIED FAULTS...mb.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Foreshocks and % - Roger Musson  03:07:00 - 12/8/2000  (4041)  (1)
        ● Re: Foreshocks and % - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  16:33:32 - 12/8/2000  (4047)  (1)
           ● Re: Foreshocks and % - Roger Musson  03:10:26 - 12/11/2000  (4060)  (1)
              ● Re: Foreshocks and % - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  15:58:36 - 12/11/2000  (4066)  (1)
                 ● Re: Foreshocks and % - Roger  03:22:02 - 12/14/2000  (4080)  (1)
                    ● Re: Foreshocks and % - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  16:08:09 - 12/14/2000  (4081)  (1)
                       ● Re: Foreshocks and % - Roger Musson  03:05:33 - 12/15/2000  (4083)  (1)
                          ● I agree - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  10:02:07 - 12/16/2000  (4084)  (0)