|
Re: Pat Robertson and the Tsunami |
Hi Mike: This group may be lots of things, but dis-passionate isn't one of them. My line "Don't know if Pat is really on track here or not..." was something of a sarcastic remark. I'm not a fan of his and used the referrence to his prediction only as a timely basis for my question about the possibility of a Tsunami in the Pacific Northwest. (I'd read the article on CNN just before posting.) I guess my sarcasm didn't come through.
Follow Ups: ● Re: Pat Robertson and the Tsunami - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 22:11:14 - 5/19/2006 (37074) (1) ● He Who Shall Not Be Named and the Tsunami - Russell 00:24:07 - 5/20/2006 (37075) (1) ● Pacific plate-have it backwards - chris in suburbia 05:00:10 - 5/20/2006 (37080) (1) ● Re: Pacific plate-have it backwards - Cathryn 13:08:40 - 5/20/2006 (37091) (1) ● Re: Pacific plate-have it backwards - chris in suburbia 05:41:58 - 5/21/2006 (37119) (1) ● Re: Pacific plate-have it backwards - Cathryn 01:22:50 - 5/30/2006 (37602) (0) ● Re: Pat Robertson and the Tsunami - chris in suburbia 15:04:11 - 5/19/2006 (37062) (2) ● Re: Pat Robertson and the Tsunami - Russell 15:44:56 - 5/19/2006 (37065) (0) ● Re: Pat Robertson and the Tsunami - Don in Hollister 15:33:10 - 5/19/2006 (37064) (1) ● Re: Pat Robertson and the Tsunami - Cathryn 20:02:19 - 5/19/2006 (37070) (0) |
|