|
Re: what pattern? |
John...you link to the total seismicity for tens of years....of course a patten that appears briefly for a week a month or so ahead of time will not show up. Look at the map on Don's second post on this thread...I guess he took quakes provided by Petra. Or, ask Don to make this graphic with all quakes, or all quakes >3 or 4, for a 1 week interval of time when Petra posted this. When Petra first noticed this, it was a pretty clear ring. What I have not done is checked the epicenter and rupture area against the ring...but am assuming the "x" on Don's map is the epicenter. Follow Ups: ● seismicity in 2006 - chris in suburbia 05:36:31 - 5/6/2006 (36811) (1) ● 10 days vs 40 days? - John Vidale 07:41:50 - 5/6/2006 (36816) (1) ● Re: 10 days vs 40 days? More To Understand - Petra 16:04:52 - 5/6/2006 (36822) (2) ● Re: 10 days vs 40 days? More To Understand - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 07:31:24 - 5/7/2006 (36834) (1) ● Re: 10 days vs 40 days? More To Understand - Petra 12:45:28 - 5/7/2006 (36842) (0) ● didn't you say 10 days? - John Vidale 20:06:38 - 5/6/2006 (36827) (1) ● Re: didn't you say 10 days? - Canie 10:40:26 - 5/7/2006 (36838) (0) |
|