Let's Talk FFA Theory
Posted by Petra on May 04, 2006 at 22:17:13:

Well John,

I know you haven't bought into the Far Field Aftershock theory,
but maybe it's time you took a second look. Let's do a little
walkabout journey across the planet and see what in the world
has been happening.

The 7.6 in Koryakia, Russian triggered Atacama, Chile.
Atacama Chile triggered Tonga.

Lastly, let's take a look the potential places which could
see disturbances from Tonga. These could take up to
30 days, but frequently occur much sooner.

While I am positive there are many other events I could
spend a few hours reviewing and noting for you, as I don't
get credit or points for being right, I'm not going to there.

It's hard to put the baby out with the bathwater when
we have so much evidence which is very current and obviously
hard to dispute. Looking once nets you nothing, but if you
keep at it, in time one has to see the results....Petra

Magnitude 7.6 KORYAKIA, RUSSIA
Thursday, April 20, 2006 at 23:25:02 UTC

http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_060420_ltbt/neic_ltbt_t.html

HIT: P-140 Magnitude 6.5 OFFSHORE ATACAMA, CHILE
Sunday, April 30, 2006 at 21:40:58 UTC
CREATING REGIONAL INSTABILITY IN TONGA
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/neic_mdbr_t.html
HIT: PANAMA - 5.1 5/2/06

P-103 Magnitude 7.9 TONGA
Wednesday, May 03, 2006 at 15:26:39 UTC
UNDERBELLY SHOT FROM ATACAMA TO TONGA, PASSING UNDER AUSTRALIA
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_060503_mgas/neic_mgas_t.html

P-WAVE POTENTIALS FROM TONGA QUAKE:

P-103 THE BAY OF BENGAL - DANGEROUS PLACE
P-140 PRINCE EDWARD REGION - LATELY UNSTABLE
P-103 WEST OF ANTOFAUGSTA, CHILE - MORE MOUNTAIN BUILDING
P-103 MONSERRAT - VOLCANIC DISTURBANCE?


Follow Ups:
     ● why would FFA work? - John Vidale  23:23:40 - 5/4/2006  (36783)  (1)
        ● Re: why would FFA work? - Petra  00:42:41 - 5/6/2006  (36809)  (1)
           ● ?? - John Vidale  07:29:30 - 5/6/2006  (36815)  (1)
              ● Re: ?? Did You Ask? - Petra  16:15:46 - 5/6/2006  (36823)  (1)
                 ● again, I ask why? - John Vidale  20:09:05 - 5/6/2006  (36828)  (1)
                    ● Re: again, I ask why? - Petra  12:29:53 - 5/7/2006  (36840)  (1)
                       ● No answer, you've given up? - John Vidale  15:18:47 - 5/7/2006  (36847)  (1)
                          ● Re: No answer, you've given up? - Canie  21:06:35 - 5/7/2006  (36848)  (1)
                             ● wasn't threatening to disappear - John Vidale  21:15:52 - 5/7/2006  (36849)  (2)
                                ● Re: wasn't threatening to disappear - Canie  12:46:38 - 5/8/2006  (36857)  (0)
                                ● Re: wasn't threatening to disappear - Petra  01:29:17 - 5/8/2006  (36853)  (2)
                                   ● Re: stolen data - Canie  12:57:27 - 5/8/2006  (36858)  (1)
                                      ● Today I Have The Evidence - Petra  16:20:41 - 5/8/2006  (36861)  (0)
                                   ● Is this about why 103 rings would work? - John Vidale  08:08:44 - 5/8/2006  (36856)  (0)