Re: Felt Quake EQ Predictions, Or?
Posted by Petra on March 11, 2006 at 00:27:49:

Glen,

To myself and my group small earthquakes are as important as larger ones. Of late I've been able to detect quakes 10 miles or less from where I am with magnitudes as low as 1.3. So I think that is significant, but to someone else, probably not. Insofar as issuing predictions these days, 3.0 quakes are a dime a dozen, so even they aren't very interesting. It's better to save your energy for something more measurable.

But to each their own, it depends on what you are trying to achieve. This group achieves 3.0's like they were rice crispies; but to the person who has a different agenda, well, it's different.

Petra


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Felt Quake EQ Predictions, Or? - Don in Hollister  00:29:28 - 3/11/2006  (34695)  (2)
        ● Re: Felt Quake EQ Predictions, Or? - glen  15:33:55 - 3/11/2006  (34707)  (0)
        ● OK >> Eval Requested - glen  02:53:08 - 3/11/2006  (34696)  (4)
           ● Miss - glen  11:26:55 - 3/12/2006  (34718)  (1)
              ● was felt - Mary Antonelli  12:06:47 - 3/12/2006  (34719)  (1)
                 ● Re: was felt - glen  13:43:20 - 3/12/2006  (34732)  (0)
           ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - chris in suburbia  08:07:15 - 3/11/2006  (34702)  (0)
           ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Don in Hollister  05:08:52 - 3/11/2006  (34701)  (1)
              ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Canie  09:32:12 - 3/11/2006  (34704)  (1)
                 ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Don in Hollister  14:02:48 - 3/11/2006  (34705)  (1)
                    ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Skywise  15:08:33 - 3/11/2006  (34706)  (1)
                       ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Don in Hollister  15:47:58 - 3/11/2006  (34708)  (1)
                          ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Skywise  18:13:57 - 3/11/2006  (34709)  (1)
                             ● Roger? - glen  18:26:32 - 3/11/2006  (34710)  (1)
                                ● Re: Roger? - Roger Hunter  19:44:29 - 3/11/2006  (34711)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Roger? - glen  19:54:10 - 3/11/2006  (34712)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Roger? - Roger Hunter  21:20:08 - 3/11/2006  (34713)  (1)
                                         ● relocated quakes - chris in suburbia  06:30:39 - 3/12/2006  (34716)  (0)
           ● Addendum - glen  03:19:34 - 3/11/2006  (34700)  (1)
              ● Re: Addendum - Roger Hunter  08:27:15 - 3/11/2006  (34703)  (0)