|
Re: Felt Quake EQ Predictions, Or? |
Glen, To myself and my group small earthquakes are as important as larger ones. Of late I've been able to detect quakes 10 miles or less from where I am with magnitudes as low as 1.3. So I think that is significant, but to someone else, probably not. Insofar as issuing predictions these days, 3.0 quakes are a dime a dozen, so even they aren't very interesting. It's better to save your energy for something more measurable. But to each their own, it depends on what you are trying to achieve. This group achieves 3.0's like they were rice crispies; but to the person who has a different agenda, well, it's different. Petra Follow Ups: ● Re: Felt Quake EQ Predictions, Or? - Don in Hollister 00:29:28 - 3/11/2006 (34695) (2) ● Re: Felt Quake EQ Predictions, Or? - glen 15:33:55 - 3/11/2006 (34707) (0) ● OK >> Eval Requested - glen 02:53:08 - 3/11/2006 (34696) (4) ● Miss - glen 11:26:55 - 3/12/2006 (34718) (1) ● was felt - Mary Antonelli 12:06:47 - 3/12/2006 (34719) (1) ● Re: was felt - glen 13:43:20 - 3/12/2006 (34732) (0) ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - chris in suburbia 08:07:15 - 3/11/2006 (34702) (0) ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Don in Hollister 05:08:52 - 3/11/2006 (34701) (1) ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Canie 09:32:12 - 3/11/2006 (34704) (1) ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Don in Hollister 14:02:48 - 3/11/2006 (34705) (1) ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Skywise 15:08:33 - 3/11/2006 (34706) (1) ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Don in Hollister 15:47:58 - 3/11/2006 (34708) (1) ● Re: OK >> Eval Requested - Skywise 18:13:57 - 3/11/2006 (34709) (1) ● Roger? - glen 18:26:32 - 3/11/2006 (34710) (1) ● Re: Roger? - Roger Hunter 19:44:29 - 3/11/2006 (34711) (1) ● Re: Roger? - glen 19:54:10 - 3/11/2006 (34712) (1) ● Re: Roger? - Roger Hunter 21:20:08 - 3/11/2006 (34713) (1) ● relocated quakes - chris in suburbia 06:30:39 - 3/12/2006 (34716) (0) ● Addendum - glen 03:19:34 - 3/11/2006 (34700) (1) ● Re: Addendum - Roger Hunter 08:27:15 - 3/11/2006 (34703) (0) |
|