Re: Why I Wrote the EQ Book. . .
Posted by Cal on February 20, 2006 at 16:08:17:

To Don, Roger, and my fave--Brian...

For starters, me, the girl who flunked science, gets the fact that Berkland uses two windows per month--I follow 'em, and yeah, I have predicted quakes and have had accurate hits during both is primary and secondary windows.

But here, this is one is for Roger...

More from the book. Chapter 18: The Most Important Questions about Earth Changes:

Should people reconsider Berkland's seismic windows?
Do you feel any responsibility for people in Asia who believed your prediction, avoided the beaches until the window closed and went surfing on the 26th?
--Roger

JB:Roger, you are childishly trying to hang a guilt trip on me for picking an eight-day period with the greatest vulnerability to quakes. When did I ever say that the risk was over when the window closed? I have always said that there are two windows per month--one associated witht he full moon and one with the new moon. The 9.0 Sumatra quake occurred on the day of the full moon just as sid the last 9-plus quake (Alaska 3/27/1064). All this year I had warned that December would have the highest potential for large quakes in 2004.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Why I Wrote the EQ Book. . . - Roger Hunter  19:53:49 - 2/20/2006  (34013)  (0)
     ● Re: Why I Wrote the EQ Book. . . - Skywise  19:01:11 - 2/20/2006  (34001)  (1)
        ● Re: Brian--Why I Wrote the EQ Book. . . - Cal  19:11:33 - 2/20/2006  (34007)  (1)
           ● Re: Brian--Why I Wrote the EQ Book. . . - Skywise  19:18:22 - 2/20/2006  (34009)  (1)
              ● Re: Brian--Why I Wrote the EQ Book. . . - Cal  19:59:50 - 2/20/2006  (34015)  (2)
                 ● Re: Brian--Why I Wrote the EQ Book. . . - Skywise  22:43:55 - 2/20/2006  (34020)  (0)
                 ● Hang tough, Cal - Roger Hunter  20:08:55 - 2/20/2006  (34016)  (1)
                    ● Re: Hang tough, Cal - Cal  20:43:37 - 2/20/2006  (34017)  (0)