|
The link and one more comment |
My constant caveat - tides, especially diurnal tides, although weak, could affect earthquakes, and I (sporatically) continue to see wonder if we'll find such a relation more clearly than we have. However, it is clear that the biggest earthquakes in the last century didn't noticeably tend to strike when the tidal stress oscillations were the largest, and neither did the last couple of decades of Bay Area and Pacific Northwest quakes. These studies Roger and I were involved in all involved hundreds to thousands of earthquakes, not just a handful at a time. Follow Ups: ● Re: The link and one more comment - glen 20:49:17 - 2/18/2006 (33876) (1) ● I see your point of view - John Vidale 21:19:00 - 2/18/2006 (33879) (1) ● Just for Kicks - glen 22:18:36 - 2/18/2006 (33883) (2) ● I see Berkland deleted you on his board - John Vidale 16:37:13 - 2/20/2006 (33991) (1) ● Re: I see Berkland deleted you on his board - glen 18:14:55 - 2/20/2006 (33997) (2) ● nice search engine on Syzygy - John Vidale 19:01:35 - 2/20/2006 (34002) (1) ● Re: nice search engine on Syzygy - glen 19:13:56 - 2/20/2006 (34008) (1) ● Mr. Bopp? - John Vidale 19:43:09 - 2/20/2006 (34012) (1) ● Re: Mr. Bopp? - glen 19:55:06 - 2/20/2006 (34014) (0) ● must have missed that - John Vidale 18:55:18 - 2/20/2006 (34000) (0) ● brings back memories - John Vidale 22:34:40 - 2/18/2006 (33884) (0) ● and the most relevant link - John Vidale 19:45:58 - 2/18/2006 (33874) (0) |
|