Re: Is It a Near Hit or A Miss?
Posted by Antonio Romino on June 25, 2000 at 10:03:13:

Salve,
to give a just answer to my last prediction is enough difficult having to base only on EMSC list,it is good but it is missing about any datum and generally shows the mag a little higher, however I’ll try to say my suppositions.

Looking at the various quakes regarding my zones, excuding those too distant and too light, I can consider only the following:

A1) Jun 11 43.1Nord 12.6 East 4.3
A2) Jun 12 44.3 Nord 12.2 East 3.2
A3) Jun 16 45.4 Nord 11.9 East 4.0
A4) Jun 18 44.6 Nord 11.0 East 4.5
A5) Jun 22 43.5 Nord 12.5 East 4.3

I would associate A2 to # 35 because it is evident.

The A3 could be associate to # 34 because often it happens that to a prediction of a quake in a zone between the Vesuvio and Etna it occurs against a quake in the region Friuli(Nord-East Italy).
Surely it is a miss, but to prove what I said above you can go to see the old prediction # 5 in which you’ll read : Friuli-Sicily ( two zones totally opposite).

The A4 could be associate to # 36 only because it is an Appeninic zone, the time and the mag are good, but it is evident a miss being the distance too large. However the quake is this one.

A particular talk goes to A1 and A3. Both are occurred in the some zone. In a previous post I said that, probabily, the EQ of 3.8, predicted for Greece-Turkey, could occurr (staying to last studies) in Aquilano ( 42.5Nord, 13.3 East).
Joining the doubt perception I had (also in zone RDB)in the full night of June 11, I would associate the A1 to the prtediction I did not posted and the A5 to the # 38.

In regard to prediction # 37, I have to correct the coordinates of Frusinate that are 41.5N,12.5E and not 46.5N,13E as I posted.

Distinti saluti, A.Romino.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Is It a Near Hit or A Miss? - Petra Challus  23:04:41 - 6/25/2000  (3169)  (0)