|
Re: Dice Roll...near miss |
Hello Chris, You are correct with both points. I was trying to get a hit. But I was also trying to show Michael how easy it can be to cheat. The parameters I set for the prediction would be hard to beat. I will continue to cheat, but in smaller circles until I determine the limits at which one can cheat. This is kind of like trying to get by bomb sniffing dogs with a kilo of C4 plastic. I do think I will beat the odds with the Farmington prediction. I think it is a legitimate study. glen Follow Ups: ● Re: Dice Roll...near miss - Roger Hunter 11:33:57 - 11/21/2005 (30865) (2) ● Re: Dice Roll...near miss - Michael Tolchard 15:07:09 - 11/21/2005 (30872) (0) ● Re: Dice Roll...near miss - glen 11:49:17 - 11/21/2005 (30866) (2) ● Odds? - Michael Tolchard 15:05:28 - 11/21/2005 (30871) (0) ● Re: Dice Roll...near miss - Roger Hunter 12:30:53 - 11/21/2005 (30867) (1) ● Re: Dice Roll...near miss - glen 12:44:25 - 11/21/2005 (30868) (1) ● Re: Dice Roll...near miss - chris in suburbia 16:15:04 - 11/21/2005 (30877) (1) ● Re: Dice Roll...near miss - Roger Hunter 21:18:57 - 11/21/2005 (30892) (0) |
|