Re: Glen's Revised Subdued Opinion
Posted by Ara on November 20, 2005 at 07:09:18:

Roger: "Nothing to offer but full of criticism."

Oh come on, Roger. You are the kettle calling the pot black. Or the stirrer of the pot, whatever.

"Check the archives... john can speak for himself"

Oh come on, Roger. I'm referring to a recent exchange in which John thought you were doing XYZ but you corrected him. So at that point John did not know what your Monte Carlo gig was all about. And Chris has stated several times he has no idea what you are doing statistically, even with the pre-Monte Carlo stuff. Now these two guys are not dumb. So I extrapolate that hardly anyone knows what you are doing.

Basically you have admitted that the pre-Monte Carlo stuff cannot handle diverse probabilities. Now you say Monte Carlo can. Where have you shown that Monte Carlo is going to step into the ring and knock everyone out?

Come on, Roger. This Monte Carlo thing was rigged up by your penpal NetSurfr, so maybe the two of you can write a paper on it.

Meanwhile, no one knows what you are doing. It's as mysterious as Shan's sun shadows.

How about you and Shan write a paper together? That would be even more super cool...two secrets divulged in one paper!


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Glen's Revised Subdued Opinion  - Roger Hunter  09:27:33 - 11/20/2005  (30787)  (1)
        ● Dr Alan Jones hits the Monte Carlo jackpot - Ara  20:43:43 - 11/20/2005  (30822)  (1)
           ● Re: Dr Alan Jones hits the Monte Carlo jackpot - Roger Hunter  20:49:51 - 11/20/2005  (30823)  (1)
              ● Re: Dr Alan Jones hits the Monte Carlo jackpot - Ara  07:32:31 - 11/21/2005  (30840)  (0)