Re: Curious to know . . .
Posted by Tony on June 03, 2000 at 12:16:08:

Thanks. I guess it's a waiting game. I take great interest in your postings. Do you think that perhaps the energy that gives way to the primary and secondary readings indicates pending activity that may not happen for some other reason? Specifically, maybe all the factors are right for the occurence of a quake, however, it doesn't happen for some other reason (geophysical structure). I have no idea what the heck I'm talking about. I just find it curious when all the factors point to an occurence that never comes.

(BTW - I just tried a case in the Newhall Courts. What a disaster!!)


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Curious to know . . . - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  16:14:15 - 6/4/2000  (3058)  (0)
     ● Re: Curious to know . . . - Bob Shannon  14:48:59 - 6/3/2000  (3055)  (1)
        ● Re: Curious to know . . . - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  16:31:48 - 6/4/2000  (3060)  (0)